Call Recording

I would like a review of my initial call setting up service. I called to check pricing and was talked into getting service. I paid extra because i did not pass the credit check. However, I was told nothing at all about there being an early termination fee. If I’d had known about this i would have never gotten service due to it being a trial thing i was searching for since providers are limited in my rural area and i had doubts about any companies ability to provide effective service. The agent did email me a contract during our call but specifically said that it was something i could go over later but it wasnt necessary i go review it at that time that it was sent basically as part of the email verification process. She never said that i was agreeing to its content and i only found out that it was a terms of use agreement days later after service was installed and i had a billing issue with that and my first bill and went through our original emails to see what i had already been charged and paid for. I dont believe i should be held underneath terms i wasnt told about nor given the oppurtunity to know they even existed. To my understanding the “mandatory” (by law) explanation that she gave me pertained to the discounts and what i was being charged for that day and how much my monthly bill was going to be and the services i would be provided. ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT A $400 EARLY TERMINATION FEE. Ridiculous. Hughesnet in my opinion uses this as a way to trap people into service they know customers would not be satisfied with. Its not right. It cost hughesnet $0 to not provide service to a customer anymore. Plus i wasnt told my equipment rental would be a forever fee and if or when i no longer had service with hughesnet that i would have to pay to ship there rented equipment back to them. These are the most important areas in the decision to get services from any type of company and not being told about them before hand should make them void. But i think , like im sure the person this original question im replying under thinks, that not having access to the recording ourself forces us to rely on an already untrustworthy  (due to the deceptive practices in initiating services) to be honest regarding a matter that otherwise would not benefit them.