Yes, and this is because of his paranoid ideation (and added lack of knowledge of the technology). He can't accept explanations that clash with his worldview.
@MarkJFine wrote:Plus he hasn't figured out that the furthest a domestic telephone call can go is only about 3,000 miles on a trunked wire and is trying to compare that to 88,000 miles in space.
Now I'm really done with his ridiculous trolling.
Yes, you are paranoid. That's a perfectly good traceroute for satellite comms. There's not one hop in there that takes 2 minutes like you said. Plus, none of the timeouts have anything to do with HughesNet - at all.
But just because it took me to embarrass you into FINALLY giving a traceroute snapshot like I originally asked, I'm not going to tell you the reason why your latency is so bad, because your paranoid delusions wouldn't believe it anyway.
OK.
Cblucas3 wrote:
That's it I'm reporting this.
@Cblucas3 wrote:
That's it I'm reporting this.
You go right ahead, play victim and report everybody. I really don't care.
This 5 page thread already shows you've been playing games from the get go. Just comes right back to you.
@Cblucas3 wrote:
Read my post again. I'm talking about satellite communication. Read the link. Even if a wired call went started with POTS and then sent internationally via satellite there is no noticable latency.
The call is either landline or via a low earth orbit satellite.
Folks... I got better things to do today... Now I'm really out.
The timeouts may very well be due to Century Link, which has issues all over the place.