Internet for a day

[maratsade]

But it does work as advertised, except for a minority who are in congested beams.

---

@Michael57 wrote:

---

---

But perhaps not as advertised, which is what causes the frustration. It is in fact advertised to be able to do those things, except for maybe online gaming, which I haven't seen anyone complain about.

---

[Michael57]

---

@maratsade wrote:

But it does work as advertised, except for a minority who are in congested beams.

---

That could be true, the announcement made about congestion and prioritization makes me doubt it, but it could be.  I suspect you have some actual data to back up that claim?

[maratsade]

I'm not going to do people's homework for them.

---

@Michael57 wrote:

---

I suspect you have some actual data to back up that claim?

---

[Michael57]

copout  

[maratsade]

Elaborate.

EDIT: Why do you think it's a copout?

Michael57 wrote:

copout  

---

[MarkJFine]

Think he's just messing with you.

[Michael57]

Aye.  I'm assuming, the homework remark, which is otherwise likely the most cringeworthy reply possible, was also in jest.

I mean it's the internet, you can say the rudest thing ever, slap an emoji on it, and call it good.   

[GabeU]

@focus93 

Your reply is blank.  

[maratsade]

Nope, not in jest and I don't see it as cringeworthy.  People need to spend the time to do their own research; I'm not going to be their research assistant.  If you think this is a cringeworthy or rude response, I respect that as your opinion, even though I don't share it. 

Michael57 wrote:

Aye.  I'm assuming, the homework remark, which is otherwise likely the most cringeworthy reply possible, was also in jest.

---