If you don't have the ability to run the tests while connected with an ethernet cable then run the tests using the HT2000W's WiFi, but ensure that NOTHING else is connected via WiFI at the time you run the tests.
Edit: The reps will have to verify if tests run via WiFi will be acceptable. @Liz @Amanda
"Also, the bit about having to make sure that your data isn't being used by the service itself???? What kind of crap is that???? My PROVIDED modem could be using up my data???" I have no clue what you're referring to.
Lastly, please watch your language. This is a public site.
@JT_Money wrote:
I had internet with a service provider who advertised 30Gbps speeds, and I averaged 25Gbps on my downloads.
There is presently no ISP in the United States that provides, nor advertises, speeds of 30Gbps, nor 25Gbps, nor anything anywhere near that speed.
BTW, at a speed of 25Gbps you'd be over your 1TB data cap in just under six minutes.
200gbps? Sure... when the worlds fastest connections aren't close to that, and a 200Gbps connection is very specialized and used for backhaul purposes between metro cities... ROFL
No problem.
Here's the bottom line. No one is trying to rip you off. When compared to ground based or cell based interntet, HughesNet's throughput is considerably more limited. Because of this limited throughput, they can't offer higher, nor unlimited, data packages. The more data offered means more people online at any given time, and doing what most people would do with more data, which is both devices that are constantly connected and using data, and streaming, which is even worse. Their infrastructure can't handle the higher traffic that numerous people doing these things would require, and the service would slow to a crawl for everyone trying to use it. Think of trying to throw 50,000 cars per hour down a road that is only designed to handle 10,000. It becomes a traffic jam. Because of this, the data caps must be in place, and with the amounts they are. The data caps cause people to ration their high speed data, but it's a necessary evil due to what the system can handle at any given time.
As for the price, satellite internet is the most expensive type of internet there is to provide, per capita. The satellites, the gateways, the fees and whatever else. It's not cheap to offer. Could it be cheaper? Probably, but nowhere near as cheap as ground based services, and in the end, they're a business.
No one is expecting you to accept bad speeds. The speed tests not only help to verify the problem, but also help to point to the cause of it, and they're a necessary part of the troubleshooting process. The reps/engineers can't help if they don't know what's going on. Again, though, the reps will have to verify if WiFi speed testing will be okay, as WiFi itself can be part of the problem.
This is such a FAQ...
First off, this is satellite internet. The technology is such that it has limited bandwidth for a limited population. Hughes provides what is fair to the people they can provide it to.
It is insane to even try to compare anything terrestrial (wired, signal-based, or fiber) to something that must go thousands of miles and back just to get to the internet, and then again to return a response.
As such, the technology is really meant for those that have literally no other option because the really greedy internet providers have determined that it's not cost effective to run anything out to you, and mobile coverage is poor to non-existant. This is a niche market and only a niche market.
So it begs the question, if you are able to obtain reliable, non-latent, unemetered 200Mbps internet via another means, why would you even choose satellite? You've clearly done the research, but still made the wrong choice, preferring to claiming a 'rip-off' instead... #brilliant
"Satellite or not, Hughes current level of service is absolutely not worth the money, but they know that because it is so niche that they can get away with it because us remote users have literally no choice.... "
The price is very good for the technology. No choices? Au contraire. You can move somewhere that has cable internet. You do have choices, and if you choose to stay, then deal with the reality that is satellite internet. The constant complaining isn't improving your situation.
Again, it's expensive because the technology, if not the non-recurring engineering of developing, launching, insuring, and maintaining a geostationary satellite is very expensive.
And you do have a choice: Use it (and appreciate that you at least have something available to you), or don't use it and/or use something else that might be available. Nobody is holding a gun to your head, saying "Use HughesNet, or else."
Also, don't recall if it was even this thread, but I really don't understand people whinging for months or more about having to pay an ETF that essentially guarantees the cost associated with about 4 or less remaining months of a 24-month contract.
" I really don't understand people whinging for months or more about having to pay an ETF that essentially guarantees the cost associated with about 4 or less remaining months of a 24-month contract"
The answer might be maths deficiency.
@maratsade wrote:The answer might be maths deficiency.
Lol... I don't like paying the $5.3k out of pocket in-network deductible on my health insurance... I think that's a rip off. #facetious
Seriously tho. How many times have we seen people complain while paying for months on end for alleged 'non-service', instead of just paying forward the 4-minus months and being done with it. They end up shelling out a lot more in the long run for the opportunity to complain some more. It's self-defeating.
Very often. I think it's a case of cutting off their nose to spite their face. Or it may just be inability to understand (and more importantly, accept) reality.
ETA: " It's self-defeating."
YES, exactly. That makes it quite mind-boggling. (Also, I don't like paying for health insurance at all. I could move back to the UK and not pay for it, or stay here and accept reality).
@MarkJFine wrote:Lol... I don't like paying the $5.3k out of pocket in-network deductible on my health insurance... I think that's a rip off. #facetious
Seriously tho. How many times have we seen people complain while paying for months on end for alleged 'non-service', instead of just paying forward the 4-minus months and being done with it. They end up shelling out a lot more in the long run for the opportunity to complain some more. It's self-defeating.
My cost for food, gas, taxes, internet, etc. is higher than other places. I want to cancel. Oh wait.....I chose to live where I do. Never mind.
@BirdDog wrote:My cost for food, gas, taxes, internet, etc. is higher than other places. I want to cancel. Oh wait.....I chose to live where I do. Never mind.
Lol...
I moved to my current location over 30 years ago: Was no such thing as mobile phones or internet and "cable was coming". I might get 2 bars of signal upstairs in my gym/den, cable is still coming (not really), and HughesNet still beats the pants off the two or three BBSes I used to dial into.
Incidentally, Verizon (then Bell Atlantic) hadn't upgraded the phone lines in the area 30 years ago when they were supposed to... and still haven't. They go wonky every time it rains.
The HughesNet Community is here for you
to find answers and ask fellow HughesNet
subscribers for help. This is a great
opportunity to discuss and share your
expertise to enhance your HughesNet
experience and that of fellow subscribers.
Visit the About the Community board for
information on how to get started with using
this resource.