About birchbay

birchbay · ‎01-26-2023

I just upgraded my Cisco SG 200 to a new Cisco CBS350 layer switch and I am unable to establish a link between the HT2000W modem/router and the VLAN. When I use Windows 10 Pro ping, I am able to ping all the VLAN's and devices (including a wireless access point) on the network with the exception of the HT2000W. When I use the CBS350 ping, I am also able to ping all the VLAN's and devices on the network with the exception of the HT2000W. Moreover, I am able to reach all the devices on the network with the exception of the HT2000W. I did not have this issue with the SG 200. If I substitute the SG 200 for the CBS350 everything works. Moreover, I tried a cold reset / reinstall of the HT2000W which did not fix the problem. Going back to the SG 200 is not an option, I need to upgrade the protection on some of the VLAN's. Any thoughts would be greatly appreciated.

birchbay · ‎07-23-2020

Thank you all for your explaination of the issue. It appears that I must apologize for the misleading subject line.

birchbay · ‎07-23-2020

Thanks, I understand the SPF record. What is the DKIM record. I have been on the phone with Hughes tech support for hours this morning. I tried to explain the SPF issue to phone tech support for hours and to have them look at the return email header before they finally contacted advanced tech support. Apparently, advanced tech support was not interested in the header and reported back that they could not reproduce the problem. The call was finally dropped without any resolution. It's kind of like that children's game we all played, we sit around in a circle and whisper a message in the ear of the person next to us; the process is repeated until it gets to the end. As we all know, the message at the end is never the same as the original message. For me the issue is that I need an email address that is independent of my hosting package emails in order to communicate with my provider and manage my website.

birchbay · ‎07-22-2020

Thank you, Your explaination certainly explains why the only bounces I get are emails sent from the Hughes SMTP server to the Network Solutions email servers. If this is indeed the case, it appears that I need to have two issues resolved, getting Syncor to update their SPF list and getting Network Solutions to stop rjecting soft fails. For me, Network Solutions may be easier to deal with, my company has been with them for quite a long time. Do you have any suggestions about approaching Syncor and having them fix their SPF list? Thanks again, Paul

birchbay · ‎07-22-2020

Sent emails are being bounced, received emails are just fine. My emails are being returned with the following message. : ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: >>> info@johnsonphoto.com (after MAIL FROM): 553 5.3.0 69.168.97.48 Your message was rejected for possible spam/virus content.Please ask your email provider to visit http://emailadmin.registeredsite.com for resolution. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- In order to isolate the problem I sent 2 emails, one from Outlook on my desktop and one from the MyHughesNet web mail. Both emails were addressed to the same receipient. The attachments are as follows: ------------------------------------- From MyHughesNet ----------------------------------------------- details.txt ------------- This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: >>> info@johnsonphoto.com (after MAIL FROM): 553 5.3.0 69.168.97.48 Your message was rejected for possible spam/virus content.Please ask your email provider to visit http://emailadmin.registeredsite.com for resolution. Untitled attachment -------------------------- Return-Path: <birchbay@hughes.net> X-Authed-Username: YmlyY2hiYXlAaHVnaGVzLm5ldA== X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=D/bnUqlj c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=x1h0AhohGG/RTEN8nKxOCg==:117 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=FKkrIqjQGGEA:10 a=c0IKAg22lHsA:10 a=GDToNFWJBcEA:10 a=FMv02harFUhbvwixEBoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=vB4yIPE5dKZ_iddtDWwA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=birchbay@hughes.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com header.from=birchbay@hughes.net; sender-id=softfail Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: transitional domain hughes.net does not designate 10.33.66.7 as permitted sender) Received: from [10.33.66.7] ([10.33.66.7:47199] helo=md08.hughes.cmh.synacor.com) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <birchbay@hughes.net>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id EB/4E-20202-5BC881F5; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:00:05 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 15:00:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Johnson <birchbay@hughes.net> To: info@johnsonphoto.com Message-ID: <278643397.172513126.1595444405079.JavaMail.root@hughes.net> Subject: test hughes send MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_172513125_842041761.1595444405078" X-Originating-IP: [72.168.145.50] X-Mailer: Zimbra 7.2.7_GA_2942 (ZimbraWebClient - GC84 (Win)/7.2.6_GA_2926) ----------------------------------- From Outlook -------------------------------------------------------- details.txt ------------ This message was created automatically by the mail system (ecelerity). A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed: >>> info@johnsonphoto.com (after MAIL FROM): 553 5.3.0 69.168.97.48 Your message was rejected for possible spam/virus content.Please ask your email provider to visit http://emailadmin.registeredsite.com for resolution. Untitled attachment -------------------------- Return-Path: <birchbay@hughes.net> X-Authed-Username: YmlyY2hiYXlAaHVnaGVzLm5ldA== X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=D/bnUqlj c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=oZryl1ZDRprEImX6oM6mKg==:117 a=oZryl1ZDRprEImX6oM6mKg==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=DAwyPP_o2Byb1YXLmDAA:9 a=_LnqSiBIVWXndqmOae4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=yOzNjrRZHYMA:10 a=L7EoCVMh1PYA:10 a=2kfr_2iKG_cA:10 a=uu05uWyGsd0A:10 a=yMhMjlubAAAA:8 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=C80NKBsKLg0WrIRMPzkA:9 a=gKO2Hq4RSVkA:10 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com header.from=birchbay@hughes.net; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=birchbay@hughes.net; spf=softfail; sender-id=softfail Authentication-Results: smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=birchbay@hughes.net; auth=pass (LOGIN) Received-SPF: softfail (smtp01.hughes.cmh.synacor.com: transitional domain hughes.net does not designate 72.168.145.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [72.168.145.50] ([72.168.145.50:30803] helo=Redwood) by smtp.hughes.net (envelope-from <birchbay@hughes.net>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPSA (cipher=AES256-SHA) id 65/8C-20202-C44881F5; Wed, 22 Jul 2020 14:24:16 -0400 From: "Linda & Paul Johnson" <birchbay@hughes.net> To: <info@johnsonphoto.com> Subject: test Hughes sent to hosting email Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 11:23:01 -0700 Message-ID: <000001d66055$27da6880$778f3980$@hughes.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0001_01D6601A.7B7E0180" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AdZgVSGdDRvOjaj6SGOwtrAm+MkOtw== Content-Language: en-us

birchbay · ‎04-21-2020

"HughesNet is prioritizing activities, which also includes de-prioritization." Wow, prioritizing includes deprioritization! PS It is deprioritization and you cannot have an activity that includes a negative of that activity. You would have flunked any graduate level class you took from me. 🙂

birchbay · ‎04-21-2020

"You sir, are an entitled person and using your profession as an excuse, yet ignoring the millions of others that have a profession that is just as important. Sorry, the world doesn't cater to you." Yes Siree, I certainly am entitled. I provide medical care, usually 60 - 80 hours per week but lately over 100 hours per week and since I am not hourly, I do not get paid overtime. Yess Siree, I really am entitled. BTW, I am questioning why I devoted my life to saving folks like you. Maybe, I should have gone to work in the corperate environment where I could have gotten rich off the results of my research.

birchbay · ‎04-20-2020

Really? You have made a great case for why net neutrality is a really stupid idea. Putting the public at risk by making emergency services and medical research compete with videao games and streaming is one of the most absurd ideas that I have ever heard! Moreover, there are numerous ways to control intenet traffic.First and foremost, Hughes should not be giving equal weight to those that have used up their data limits with those that have not used up their data limits. Second, Hughes could prioritize sources (oops, net neutrality again). I have used the internet since it was first made public; what has become clear is that the internet is becoming more and more useless. Go ahead and make excuses for Hughes, it is your life that you are putting at risk. As for me, I WILL be contacting the state ________ general as soon as the CoVid-19 risk level starts declining. I am sure that he will be quite interested in the 459 KBPS that I am getting versus the 25 MBPS that Hughes advertises.

birchbay · ‎04-17-2020

My iPhones and iPads backed up perfectly until Hughes decided to NOTreduce the speed of people when they went over their maximum data usage! I am a researcher at a university medical center and my wife is an accounting supervisor for a major city, both on the west coast.. My wife also has been given the responsibility of being the controler on the city CoVid Emergency Response Team. We both need access to our work networks, 24 hours a day! Yet, Hughes seems to believe that the advertised speed of 25 MBPS dropping to 0.4 MBPS is perfectly all right. NOT If people want to use the internet to stream videos while they are staying at home or quarentined, then they should be paying for usage and Hughes should be controlling the numbe of people they are servicing. I resent like **bleep** the fact that my wife and I need to be at the office all day and many times at night because we do not have the internet access we paid for!

birchbay · ‎04-17-2020

My wife and I have not been able to back up our iPhones or iPads for going on 2 months. I have attempted to contact tech support by both email and phone - NO RESPONSE by either. The iPhones and iPads backup quickly when attached to the University or the City internets. The problem is, we are in a forced 'Work at Home'

Online Status	Offline
Date Last Visited	‎01-27-2023 09:31 PM

About birchbay

Unable to connect to new VLAN layer 3 switch.

Re: smtp.hughes.net blocking my emails

Re: smtp.hughes.net blocking my emails

Re: smtp.hughes.net blocking my emails

smtp.hughes.net blocking my emails

Re: Cannot backup iPhones or iPads

Re: Cannot backup iPhones or iPads

Re: Cannot backup iPhones or iPads

Re: Cannot backup iPhones or iPads

Cannot backup iPhones or iPads