Forum Discussion
No longer a luxury
carolynruth wrote:To the customers who have no other internet companies available, they are a parasite.
So one of the only two services that provide internet access to the people who terrestrial services don't think enough of to bother with is a parasite? Yeah, that makes a lot of sense.
If satellite internet didn't exist, what would you do then? Move?
Considering geostationary satellite internet is by far the most expensive form of internet to provide, per capita, I'd say they're doing better than what the others don't provide at all.
On a side note, most of the problems people have with this type of service are related to streaming. Part of the problem is congestion and the other part is something that is completely out of their control... latency. Thankfully, streaming is not a necessity, and if visual entertainment is that important there is always satellite TV.
carolynruth wrote:Other companies, such as Spectrum, have grown and rise to this chalenge.
You may want to research the differences between the services and why Spectrum and those like it can easily "rise to the challenge", unlike HughesNet.
Some would argue that the demand that steaming taxes the overall system is the actual reason for the congestion, so it's a self-destroying prophesy...
Did I say that out loud?
- GabeU5 years agoDistinguished Professor IV
MarkJFine wrote:Some would argue that the demand that steaming taxes the overall system is the actual reason for the congestion, so it's a self-destroying prophesy...
Did I say that out loud?
Yep. LOL.
For months I've been trying to think of the term used to describe this situation, as in the problem being caused by the action itself. I think "self destroying prophesy" pretty much hits the nail on the head.
- MarkJFine5 years agoProfessor
really, it's a spiral:
1: "I can't stream"2: "That's because the congestion is too high"
1: "What causes that?"
2: "People trying to stream"
1: "Oh..."
Related Content
- 2 years ago