@GabeU wrote: @gaines_wright wrote: I wouldn't be suprised, with so much deceptive marketing going on, that so many people are canceling satellite ISP contracts without paying an ETF, that the lenders are just ignoring it. Neither lenders, nor credit rating agencies, ignore someone having a debt placed into collections. As well, neither cares what the debt collection is for. When it's present it affects, and will continue to do so for quite some time. Unless someone has a legitimate excuse and successfully fights to have it removed from the record, which is both time consuming and emotionally draining, it affects their credit for years. No offence intended, but do you have any first hand experience with this happening? You seem so sure about it. I certainly didn't find it so.forty years ago, when lenders, looked at the details of the causes of a bad credit rating, and acted accordingly. At least my lender did with my credit rating, which at the time the collection agencies were doing their best to try to destroy. I financed a new truck at that time with no problems. All this makes me want to cancel Hughes, not pay the ETF, and then finance a new truck. :>)> Just kidding. Anybody want to bet that I wouldn't be successful? I'm suprised no one caught the original point of my post, which is that satellite ISPs are using predatory and misleading tactics to lure in new suscribers, and then they the hold the boogie man of an ETF over their heads to try to keep them. IMO this is not wise marketing, and I don't think it's going to be successful in the long run I know one person who didn't pay the Hughes ETF with no repercussions. I await the result of poor lamb doing the same with Viasat.
... View more