Forum Discussion
Service not what sales claimed it would be.
I’ve had Hughesnet over a month and it’s worthless to me. The salespeople asked me to describe what I do online, which I did, some YouTube videos, spots streaming and some movies. It does none of t...
Brayhaven wrote:it said there was only one satellite and a capability of something like 240K subscribers capability at the advertised volume & speed.
Keep in mind, however, that because system load varies, the system can actually support a much larger number of subscribers.
The only way they could remain a viable company with a low enough subscriber base to guarantee 25Mbps at any given time, barring technical or weather related issues, would be to charge an inordinately high monthly fee. Likely upwards of $500 or more. Maybe even $1000.
Starlink does pretty well 50-150 mbps for 110/mo after equipment purchase.
nt
I’m finding that with HN.
Should have stayed with DSL.
Starlink gets good reviews as best sat interne.
spock was thinking Star Trek, not star link 😎Time will reveal the answer. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
