ContributionsMost RecentMost LikesSolutionsRe: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings? Off Hughes website: Cellular Backhaul Ideally suited to deliver affordability, efficiency and capability: Delivers round trip latency less than 600 ms and jitter of approximately 10 ms. This validates my claim with latency explanation being a farce. If their system can do 600ms for backhaul with the same satellite at the same distance it can be done for consumer retail customers. The satellite or system regulates the response and prioritizes with enterprise customer getting the highest. Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?Signal strength, whether weak or strong, is not the same as interference. A "strong" signal can be affected by a source of interference. This would be a electromagnetic source causing this. So, as you can see, I'm still riding high.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?My apologies. I did not equate weak signal with interference. Throughout all this I was always getting a strong signal (5 bars) using various tools to check it with. Corporate suggested that although I was getting a strong signal it was being scrambled, hence interference. So I missed the shuttle suggestion you had implanted somewhere in your post. After reading this and doing the trace via WiFi I checked for signal strength but missed your instructions on interference. Once again my apologies. I've gone through the posts and still can't find any mention of interference, just signal strength which was above nominal.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings? Got off the phone with Corporate Executive Care. I reported th slander and accusations when I was just trying to sound my thoughts on why. The fellow asked me if the modem was near anything that can interfere. Wow, so simple and I didn't consider it so I don't blame you guys either. My medical monitoring device was apparently interfering with it. It operates via cellular network. I moved it, ran a trace and ping and no timeouts and no extreme latency. Next time "Professors" offer suggestions instead of belittling a person. Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?Finally, a suggestion worthy of investigation. Thank you.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?That's it I'm reporting this.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?My God, you can't see where it times out twice? I'm truly am wasting my time here.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?Read my post again. I'm talking about satellite communication. Read the link. Even if a wired call went started with POTS and then sent internationally via satellite there is no noticable latency. I'm just trying to cover my bases. How about giving me the benefit of the doubt and give me instructions on how to fix my problem instead of belittling me, implying that I'm misconstruing the facts and slandering me by saying I'm paranoid. I have not done this to you folks. I'm sure this behavior is outside of Community Guidelines.Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings? Paranoid huh? Take a look at the timeouts. This is the problem I have. Not every page does this. It will go fair for several pages and just stall. Time outs or other messages like Not Connected To The Internet. Re: Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?Why do my long distance calls and other communication type satellites not suffer from high latency rates? http://satellites.spacesim.org/english/function/communic/index.html