Forum Discussion
Latency Or Satellite Shortcomings?
There is all this talk of distance affecting latency which doesn't seem to wash. If the signal has to travel 88,000 miles latency shouldn't be an issue when the speed of light is considered. Traveling...
Cblucas3 wrote:
So I missed the shuttle suggestion you had implanted somewhere in your post.
There was no "subtle suggestion implanted somewhere" in my post. A "weak signal" normally refers to intensity, but it's not the only thing it refers to.
Good day to you.
Signal strength, whether weak or strong, is not the same as interference. A "strong" signal can be affected by a source of interference. This would be a electromagnetic source causing this. So, as you can see, I'm still riding high.
Off Hughes website: Cellular Backhaul
Ideally suited to deliver affordability, efficiency and capability:Delivers round trip latency less than 600 ms and jitter of approximately 10 ms.
This validates my claim with latency explanation being a farce. If their system can do 600ms for backhaul with the same satellite at the same distance it can be done for consumer retail customers. The satellite or system regulates the response and prioritizes with enterprise customer getting the highest.
