Forum Discussion
Service not what sales claimed it would be.
That was in a research report I read on it when I was trying to find out why it wasn’t working for me.
it said there was only one satellite and a capability of something like 240K subscribers capability at the advertised volume & speed.
not sure what the date was on it, but seemed well
researched
Brayhaven wrote:it said there was only one satellite and a capability of something like 240K subscribers capability at the advertised volume & speed.
Keep in mind, however, that because system load varies, the system can actually support a much larger number of subscribers.
The only way they could remain a viable company with a low enough subscriber base to guarantee 25Mbps at any given time, barring technical or weather related issues, would be to charge an inordinately high monthly fee. Likely upwards of $500 or more. Maybe even $1000.
- Brayhaven4 years agoFreshman
Starlink does pretty well 50-150 mbps for 110/mo after equipment purchase.
- GabeU4 years agoDistinguished Professor IV
nt
- Brayhaven4 years agoFreshman
I’m finding that with HN.
Should have stayed with DSL.
Starlink gets good reviews as best sat interne.
spock was thinking Star Trek, not star link 😎 - maratsade4 years agoDistinguished Professor IV
Time will reveal the answer. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Related Content
- 4 years ago
- 6 years ago
- 8 years ago
- 9 years ago
- 8 years ago