Forum Discussion
Rankings
- 8 years ago
Distinguished Professor I-V
Professor
Associate Professor
Assistant Professor
Senior Instructor
Instructor
Adjunct Instructor
Teaching Assistant
Advanced Tutor
Tutor
Senior
Junior
Sophomore
Freshman
New PosterLurker rankings:
Scholar
Researcher
Learner
Observer
Spectator
New Member
Sadly based solely on number of posts, not content.
If you peek around you can see the curtis-m is ranked as a Tutor while BirdDog is a Senior (I'll grant you that BD is not a Pup but .......)
Hummmm.
Just an observation from the Peanut Gallery.
"Sadly based solely on number of posts, not content."
Yep, and that's just wrong.
- Gwalk9008 years agoHonorary Alumnus
The stuff on the Internet is a lot like the Wild West.
You just have to know how to tell the wheat from the chaff. That to me is where (with all Community Disclaimers aside) the Community Rankings come into play. Nothing of course is absoute, but with limited Mod comments to validate comments made by users and former "Champs" how are they to assess the "Help" posted in our now user to user Community.
For me, that means I am wasting a lot of time making long detailed posts that carry the same validity, the same weight if you will, as perhaps a post by curtis-m.
- GabeU8 years agoDistinguished Professor IV
Gwalk900 wrote:For me, that means I am wasting a lot of time making long detailed posts that carry the same validity, the same weight if you will, as perhaps a post by curtis-m.
That is VERY unfortunate, and IMHO, quite unfair.
All of that time that you and the other formerly titled Champions spent helping others and earning that former title and you are now relegated to the same level as someone who creates threads that are anything but productive and/or helpful. It's not right. I know that you and the others didn't help multitudes of people to earn that title, but the title was earned, nonetheless, and earned through hard work and dedication, and now....
There needs to be a title that confers that you and the others who had the former title are people who can be trusted to help with issues and that you know what you are talking about. And now, with the revelation that the mods are stepping back, a title conveying such is even more important than before. I hope you and the others like you eventually get such a title.
- GabeU8 years agoDistinguished Professor IV
Gwalk900 wrote:The stuff on the Internet is a lot like the Wild West.
You just have to know how to tell the wheat from the chaff. That to me is where (with all Community Disclaimers aside) the Community Rankings come into play. Nothing of course is absoute, but with limited Mod comments to validate comments made by users and former "Champs" how are they to assess the "Help" posted in our now user to user Community.
For me, that means I am wasting a lot of time making long detailed posts that carry the same validity, the same weight if you will, as perhaps a post by curtis-m.
I couldn't agree more. It's now much harder for the person seeking help to know who to trust, and they won't know to trust those exceptional people who previously earned that trust through their hard work. It's disheartening.
Related Content
- 4 years ago
- 7 years ago