Forum Discussion
access to router source code
- 8 years ago
Last response...
I could care less if there is a difference between the "modem" and "router", you will get the same response that Jezra did. - 8 years ago
Hi Liz
I think your response may have been colored by the oddly aggressive posts by the other forum members.
As you can see in that old quoted thread, it was asking a wholly different question unrelated to this one.
The router of this modem *is* running Linux with Busybox. Both of which are under the GPL v2 license. It is not a question of what OS the modem's router is running. That is already clearly available from the modem's syslog as I quoted in the original post.
For your reference:
https://busybox.net/license.html#enforce
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/kernel-enforcement-statement.html
Please do pass this on up your support channels.
Thank you.
Liz, Amanda, please forward my request to the appropriate party.
To the other commentors, I don't know what Hughesnet provides you all to add such pointless noise in an attempt to spin the focus of a thread, but its mildly annoying, and in this case they are rather uninformed responses. Or if I give you the benefit of the doubt, and your statements indicate a deeper knowledge that you have, that the modem itself is running on Linux, then that is of great interest as well.
But in attempt to help you understand. Your quotes of "software used in the modem" and "modem firmware" is misleading - No, it is not the modem software/firmware in question, but rather the software used in the router, which is distinct and separate. The HT2000w has two pcb boards - one for the modem, one for the router. The router comes from Arcadyan, as can be found in the eff-cee-cee filing for the wireless router.
As should be obvious, requesting access to the source code does not construe an intent to modify the unit. And no, there are no special exceptions that allow a company to distribute Linux without providing access to the source code; Linux has no dual licensing. So as much as you all want to step up and somehow, in your perception, "protect" Hughesnet for whatever misguided reasons, in this case your statements add no value to this thread.
Lol... You're so confused between operating system software (Linux) and modules that use that software it's hilarious. Again, not all secondary software is required to be open source under GPL. Do you know how many secondary kernel modules I have that are not GPL?
- sozoridge8 years agoSophomore
MarkJFine, no confusion, except on your part. I'm asking for the LInux source code and any other GPL software that is running on the router. I'm not asking for any application or non GPL software that is running ontop of it.
- MarkJFine8 years agoProfessor
I just read your post three times. You were non-specific and implied you wanted all of the source. Nice reclama, keep peddling backwards.
- sozoridge8 years agoSophomore
MarkJFine wrote:I just read your post three times. You were non-specific and implied you wanted all of the source. Nice reclama, keep peddling backwards.
Thank you for being so invested in this thread, that you read my post three times. Language is an art; one specifically meant to convey an intended meaning to the viewer. I'll conceed that I failed to provide you with an understanding of what was written. But, then you were not my target audience.
Related Content
- 8 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 9 months ago
- 5 years ago