Forum Discussion
access to router source code
- 8 years ago
Last response...
I could care less if there is a difference between the "modem" and "router", you will get the same response that Jezra did. - 8 years ago
Hi Liz
I think your response may have been colored by the oddly aggressive posts by the other forum members.
As you can see in that old quoted thread, it was asking a wholly different question unrelated to this one.
The router of this modem *is* running Linux with Busybox. Both of which are under the GPL v2 license. It is not a question of what OS the modem's router is running. That is already clearly available from the modem's syslog as I quoted in the original post.
For your reference:
https://busybox.net/license.html#enforce
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/kernel-enforcement-statement.html
Please do pass this on up your support channels.
Thank you.
It piques the curiosity to why the responders of this thread have such a vested interest.
Why I want the Linux source is irrelevant, it is my legal right, along with every other person that has received one of these modems, and requires no explanation. Whether it is running on one PCB or another is irrelevant. The 3 year old quoted thread regarding a different modem is irrelevant. That you all have any opinion on this is irrelevant. The fact that these forums had one other user that asked similar questions is irrelevant.
Unless you are in Hughesnet employ and have the authority to decline and fullfill my request, you have no need to respond to this thread, except seemingly to promote a disinformation agenda, which is telling in itself to what Hughesnet encourages/desires from you.
Related Content
- 8 years ago
- 3 years ago
- 9 months ago
- 5 years ago