You have several errors and misconceptions here.
>>Hopefully, politicians will fight to make internet access a fundamental right and regulate it like radio and power.
The fight needs to start with the voters. Get involved.
>>Until then, predatory providers like Hughes.net will continue to provide substandard service at inflated prices.
Not sure why you think this is a predatory service. HughesNet comes to rural areas because other ISPs can't be bothered serving rural customers. They're not edging out other ISPs. As for the prices, that's based on the technology which costs millions or more. It's expensive technology to create and maintain, and so it's expensive for the end user.
>>I'm sure Hughes can rationalize their expense and limitations.
Yes, and with reason, facts, and figures.
>>I'm sure they would gladly let their prices and control be regulated in trade for federal subsidies
Why wouldn't they?
>>They are running it down the side of my road right now.
Good. That's happening in many areas. Hopefully eventually we will all get fibre.
>>Hughes divides my purchased band width so that about 60% is available only in the middle of the night, starting at 2:00 AM.
The broadband you get after 2 a.m. is not purchased broadband. You didn't pay for it; it's a bonus. They can afford to give you a bonus because of less usage during the night. They don't even have to do that; they could just have you use your purchased broadband during the entire day.
>>Then they sell you tokens to buy back some of the bandwidth you've already paid for during peak hours.
You haven't paid for the bonus broadband. You are also responsible for how you use the limited broadband you get. If you overuse it, you can buy tokens. They don't have to offer that either. They could just cut you off, but they don't. They sell you tokens at $3 each. Verizon's tokens cost $15 each.
>>They also farm out their tier 1 support to sweat shops somewhere in India.
They have Tier 1 support in the US too. Their employees come from many places. Why do you think they are sweatshops? Where is your evidence? Do you have documents to prove that your opinion is right?
>>When I ask "Bob" where his office is located, Bob gets a little evasive.
Maybe try not being rude? I've had their support staff tell me where they are, no problem. But I don't have a problem with them being in Thailand, India, Texas, or California. And they have been helpful as well, and polite.
>>I'm sure they are fearful because they've been told not to disclose that information and will be severely punished if caught doing so.
Why are you sure? Again, do you have evidence? Internal documents, memos, recordings, films? Provide evidence to back up your opinions.
>>The local techs who install the equipment for customers are independent contractors, not employees. That means no benefits like insurance, 401Ks, etc. and I doubt they will ever get rich subbing for Hughes. Hughes.net is fast becoming a business like the car title loan offices that pop up in poor neighborhoods.
You have a lot of opinions, and you're entitled to your own opinions, but not to your own facts. You have provided absolutely no evidence here and are basically airing out your own ideas about something you have no knowledge of, just opinions.
??their policies have always been predatory - Fair Access Policy that is not clearly communicated during the sale or even hinted at in their marketing. Throttling the bandwidth (FAP) as if Grandma uploading pictures of her grandkids to social media is somehow a threat to the unimaginable, vast amount of bandwidth they have.
Fair Access is not predatory, it's fair. Everyone deserves to have access, and given that the satellite's broadband is limited (not vast, as you erroneously claim), it has to be rationed. And Grandma is not the problem. The problem is people like you who want to do data-intensive activities such as streaming, and who don't understand the limitations of the technologies, so when a policy hits them, they whine about it. Want to have more data? Move to a city that offers terrestrial internet. No one's forcing you to stay where you are.
>>Moving 60% of purchased bandwidth to the middle of the night, undiscounted even though it is inconvenient to use. Again, no transparency about this.
It's not purchased bandwidth. It's bonus bandwith you did not pay for. You may want to read all the FAQs and documentation before making these erroneous pronouncements.
>>The lobbyists from the internet industry fight, bribe and cheat to keep regulatory legislation from happening.
Please provide factual evidence to back up your opinions.
>>Once the fiber installation is done, I'll switch to that company.
Please. And as soon as you can. That way you can start finding fault with them, as they too will have policies that you will feel violate your immense sense of entitlement.
>>A company that will be no better than Hughes in their predatory policies, inflated prices and usage of cheap, non-American labor for tier 1 support. But, for the first time in 25 years, I'll be able to stream a movie, subscribe to a streaming service, listen to podcasts and download large files without worrying about being throttled after using 30% of the bandwidth I purchase every month.
Ah, the holy streaming. Heaven forbid you have to curtail that. You poor thing, having to share and control your usage.
>>Since this is a Hughes forum, this will probably get deleted by a moderator without getting posted. I would call that unethical, but corporations aren't bound by ethical constraints.
Actually, they are. But you wouldn't know that.
>> If it does get posted, then good for Hughes for allowing open public discourse, even though this privately owned forum for isn't bound by the 1st Amendment. And to the employee who responds to this, I understand it is your job to do so and I look forward to our conversation.
I'm responding to this and I'm not an employee. I'm a long time subscriber (over 15 years).
