Forum Discussion
Happy with Gen5?
The people who spend time here are volunteers that are giving back, like people often do when they're grateful and want to give back to those who have helped them by turning around and helping others. This may be a foreign concept to some, but it works well in communties such as this one, which is mostly peer-to-peer help.
Gen4 was more consistent for me, but I came late to it -- It may have been glitchy at first too.
I mean besides those 3 people who spend their whole days hanging out on these boards?
maratsade wrote:
Gen4 was more consistent for me, but I came late to it -- It may have been glitchy at first too.
It was. Trust me... it was.
- BirdDog7 years agoAssistant Professor
MarkJFine wrote:
maratsade wrote:
Gen4 was more consistent for me, but I came late to it -- It may have been glitchy at first too.It was. Trust me... it was.
Was, and still is.......at least in my case.
- MarkJFine7 years agoProfessor
BirdDog wrote:
Was, and still is.......at least in my case.Nature of the beast. Any time you use radio waves to replace hardwiring, you're going to increase susceptibility to a lot of things and reliability is going to suffer as a result. Extend that over vastly larger distances, and I'm sure it increases exponentially. Compress the data over the stream: You lose even more potential reliability (e.g., change one bit in a zip file and you might as well toss the whole thing) over the advantage of gaining speed.
This is the thing I feel most people just don't seem to understand, yet they keep comparing it to their local hardwired ISP.
Related Content
- 8 years ago
- 8 years ago
- 4 years ago
- 8 years ago