cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Warning, don't fry your modem.

Highlighted

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.


@maratsade wrote:

You have discovered my secret identity as Skynet. This may not bode well for you.

Signed: I, Skynet.


  ROTFL!  I guess I better get my 1000 ton hydraulic press and my vat of molten steel out of the barn.  Smiley Embarassed)>

Highlighted
Junior

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.


@vladams2015 wrote:

 

 Companies like HughesNet, Viasat/Exede, etc should use LMR400 as a baseline, with N-type connectors, and certainly no dielectric. Techs often overlook (or don't understand) how a dielectric grease will impact impedence in the connector. We rely on internal dielectrics in the cables to maintain a matched impedence and minimize signal loss and transmit power gain...yet we make it common place to impact impedences and increase the loss/gain while using a (sure its solid copper core) cable that has its own inherent signal loss issues regardless of impedence matching.

 

It is truly a shameful practice in the RF world. If HN can't pinpoint problems with my system, I will be building an LMR400 cable from the dish to the modem, removing dielectrics, and changing all connectors to N-type and see what happens. Guarantee my speed will increase and transmit power will decrease. There are a lot of factors at play that should be customizable in these systems, but alas it is a cookie cutter product that is meant to work for Joe in the inner city with a 20 ft cable run, and Susie in the farmland with a 100 ft run. 



You are going to have a much bigger problem trying to use 50 ohm LMR400 in your 75 ohm HN system than you will with some dielectric grease in your F connectors. Also keep in mind that the cabling between the modem and the dish is not carrying RF. The radio in the system is located at the antenna feedhorn and is integrated with the LNB. Signal quality as measured by the HT2000W is determined at the dish itself. 

Highlighted

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.

............................. Also keep in mind that the cabling between the modem and the dish is not carrying RF. The radio in the system is located at the antenna feedhorn and is integrated with the LNB. Signal quality as measured by the HT2000W is determined at the dish itself. 

 

  Very interesting, but I'm somewhat confused ( as I often am ).  Does this mean that the coax is carrying digital data as well as the DC power for the radio, and then the radio converts it to RF?  If so, wouldn't a piece of cat 5 cable work just as well?

 

  I'm asking this because some years ago I had Mainstreet broadband, which used a small square antenna which was hooked to a modem with cat5.  I almost cried when they went out of business, $28 a month with no added taxes or fees, blazing fast, and with unlimited data.

 
Highlighted
Sophomore

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.

You make one interesting yet terrible point @pswired

If I am talking about impedance matching, do you not think I would use 75 ohm LMR400? I mean justifiable concern but I can assure you I will impedence match.

Keep in mind one other thing, seriously now...signal strength is measured at the dish itself sure. The problem with your concern is that you believe there is no chance for signal loss or transmit power gain between the modem and the dish, and for this you are sadly mistaken but understandably so.

If there was not need for RF cable between the dish and the modem, it would be on much cheaper and extremely faster 1000/100/10 cat6e with excellent shielding metal backshells, and shields connected to the backshells, with dielectric running through the cable. My point is that you could have all of the bells and whistles in a cat 6 cable and still be cheaper than solid copper core RF. So...what’s the deal then? Why (according to you) would you use RF cable when there is no RF traveling between the LNBF and the modem?
Highlighted
Junior

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.

So, I've done some more research on the HT2000W and its corresponding ODUs and found the following:

 

-I assumed, since HN reps and installation documents routinely call the ODU a "radio" that all of the system modulation and demodulation was being performed outdoors. Apparently that's not the case, and HN is using incorrect terminology. 

 

-It appears that the system modulation is performed in the IDU according to its datasheet: https://www.hughes.com/sites/hughes.com/files/2017-04/HT2000_H56163_HR.pdf

 

-Since the cable between the IDU and ODU is RG6, obviously Ka band RF (25+ GHz) is not travelling across that cable. The ODU is downconverting to some IF. Hughes won't tell us what that IF is. https://community.hughesnet.com/t5/Tech-Support/Need-to-know-IF-frequency-used-between-antenna-and-m...

 

-Modern microwave systems often do have all of the RF components located in the ODU, yet still use coax to connect to the IDU, even though it's just digital data flowing between the two. Especially in residential satellite, installers are used to working with coax, and there would be additional costs and time associated with training them to work with outdoor twisted pair cabling. Also, coax conenctor ends are (in general) easier to waterproof than RJ series connectors are.

 

So, bottom line, yes losses in the IF cable matter, but a slight impedance mismatch due to dielectric grease in a connector is not going to ruin the system margin. Here's the official doc from HN on IF cable lengths, which is telling: http://www.satelliteguys.us/xen/attachments/fsb_080202_01a_spaceway_cables-pdf.36329/

Highlighted
Sophomore

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.

Chances are the LNBF is amplifying and sending L band. Impedance mismatch on L band is still a big big deal, as is signal loss through the cable.

Point being, your RG6 from your dish to your modem is not carrying simply a TX/RX, so dielectric grease impacting impedence (especially with 75ohm systems) and signal loss transmit power gain will (in most cases) severely degrade a system design to transmit at 25/3

Thanks for your research though. Always looking for new info in my world!
Highlighted
Sophomore

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.

I also missed the portion where you discuss RJ and coax connectors and waterproofing along with twisted pairs.
A DB9 is much easier to waterproof than is an RJ45, and cheaper yet. As far as twisted pairs, yeah so “training them” to use twisted pair is kind of a silly statement. Just saying
Highlighted

Re: Warning, don't fry your modem.


@pswired wrote:

So, I've done some more research on the HT2000W and its corresponding ODUs and found the following:

 

  Thanks for the info!